Complete public preview
Sample AI Face Analysis Report
See how the report is presented before you buy. This example uses the same display as the paid report, with eight dimensions, explained readings, strengths, suggestions and a four-week plan.
Illustrative sample: the text and numbers are fictional examples, not a real person’s assessment or a customer’s private photos.
Overall PSL score
5.2
ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE. These invented values demonstrate the report format. In a real report, this overview connects visible strengths, uncertain readings and the first practical styling changes. No real person was scored for this example.
Where you sit
The sample sits in a reference band for the displayed score. This is not a measured population percentile or a comparison with a representative dataset.
Harmony profile · 8 dimensions
Symmetry
5.4/ 8
Small left–right differences would be described alongside pose and expression.
Harmony
5.3/ 8
This section explains how features work together instead of treating one ratio as decisive.
Proportions
5.1/ 8
Visible proportions are put in context; a frontal photo cannot establish bone dimensions.
Skin quality
4.8/ 8
Lighting limits any impression of visible texture. This is not a skin diagnosis.
Sexual dimorphism
5.0/ 8
Appearance cues are described without inferring hormones or biological measurements.
Eye area
5.6/ 8
Eye framing includes brows, visible lid space and the photograph’s expression.
Jawline
5.2/ 8
The report separates frontal outline from what the two side photographs can support.
Memorable features
5.5/ 8
Distinctive features can contribute character without fitting a single template.
Feature readings
Decimal values estimated from your photos, placed against the classical aesthetic canon. Not-scored = the photo angle cannot support an honest reading.
| Reading | Value | Band |
|---|---|---|
Canthal tilt — example Illustrative reading only. Head roll and corner visibility must be considered. | +2.1° | Balanced |
Eye spacing — example An example dimensionless ratio, not a calibrated physical distance. | 1.02 | Balanced |
Visible face length / width — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 1.42 | Balanced |
Jaw / cheek width — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 0.79 | Balanced |
Midface ratio — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 1.04 | Balanced |
Mouth / face width — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 0.36 | Balanced |
Lower-face share — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 42% | Balanced |
Nose / mouth width — example Fictional value shown to demonstrate the reading format, not a recommended target. | 0.65 | Balanced |
True hairline-based facial thirds Shown as unscored when the photographs cannot support a reliable reading. | — | Not scored |
Calibrated pupil distance Shown as unscored when the photographs cannot support a reliable reading. | — | Not scored |
Nose projection depth Shown as unscored when the photographs cannot support a reliable reading. | — | Not scored |
Bone-level jaw angle A photograph does not establish the underlying bone angle; uncertain items can remain unscored. | — | Not scored |
Your strengths
Eye-area framing
A real report explains which visible details contribute to this impression and where photo quality limits confidence.
Consistent facial outline
The frontal and side views would be discussed together rather than treating each as a different person.
Ranked improvement plan
1.Compare a cleaner side silhouette
Start with a reversible hairstyle change that keeps the sides controlled and avoids adding unnecessary height.
Why first: You can compare the effect before committing to a haircut.
How to: Take front and side photos of two styled versions in the same lighting. Choose the one you prefer in ordinary conditions.
2.Create a repeatable photo setup
More consistent photos make small styling differences easier to assess.
Why first: This reduces the chance of confusing a lighting change with a facial change.
How to: Use eye-level framing, soft even light, a relaxed expression and a little camera distance. Keep these conditions for the comparison.
Your 4-week plan
- 1
Week 1 · Establish a baseline
Take consistent front and side photos and choose one styling question to explore.
- 2
Week 2 · Compare two hairstyles
Try two reversible styling options and compare comfort, appearance and effort.
- 3
Week 3 · Test everyday practicality
Wear the preferred option in ordinary settings and adjust it to your hair texture.
- 4
Week 4 · Keep what works
Review the photos and keep changes you enjoy. This is a styling experiment, not a promised score increase.
What your side photos revealed
A complete report uses one front photo and two side photos. This section explains the additional visible information, such as profile silhouette and hairstyle volume. The sample has no source photos and cannot demonstrate a real profile assessment.
Authored fictional sample for previewing the paid report format. Actual observations and the amount of detail depend on the submitted photos. AI interpretation is subjective, not a clinical assessment or a guaranteed improvement plan.
How is a full report different from free measurements?
Free tools calculate geometry from one photo in your browser. The paid report combines front, left and right photos for an AI interpretation. The report page shows current pricing and lets you prepare your photos before starting. Viewing this sample has no charge.
See the report and pricing →